Despite the fact that SDN has been identified as the primary solution to the challenges that the growing network's infrastructure is experiencing, it is still in its development. Benefits such as increased functionality, cheaper cost, and higher efficiency have been highlighted, but various obstacles must also be addressed. As SDN becomes more widely acknowledged challenges develop, new options are proposed.
SDN's key issue is scalability. Two sub-issues can be identified from this single problem: (a) controller scalability and (b) network node scalability. Over 6 million flows per second can be handled by a single controller. As a result, only one controller (or several controllers) can handle the control plane services required for a high set of data forwarding nodes. Instead of operating on a peer-to-peer basis, the centralised controller should be physically distributed to improve scalability.
Nevertheless, if it is a distributed or peer-to-peer controller network, the controller's problems when interaction occurs will be shared among network nodes. Hyper Flow and Onix are well-known for their scalability capabilities. Onix operates by delivering and dividing network status to physically distributed controllers. HyperFlow is an application that enables the linking of independently managed OpenFlow networks. The HyperFlow programs will disperse the events that allow modifications to the network condition, and all of the dispersed events will be replayed by the other controllers to recreate the circumstance.
Hence, every controller would function with about the same homogeneous network topology.
Efficiency and adaptability
A basic difficulty of SDN is how to effectively deal with high-level packet processing flows. In this case, adaptability and efficiency are the two most important variables to consider. The capability of networks to react to new and unprecedented functions, such as software and network facilities, is referred to as adaptability. The speed at which information is delivered from the control plane to network nodes in the data plane is referred to as efficiency.
Security is a fundamental component of software-defined networking. SDN security must be incorporated into the design in order to ensure usability, integrity, and protection of all elements and data. You'll need to secure and protect the device, rely on each component's SDN, ensure the controller does everything you want, and if something goes wrong, the architecture should be able to identify, fix, and reveal the issue. Security breaches and SDN safety hazards are possible due to the division of the data and control aircraft. The best location for SDN controllers, switches, and other devices is still a work in progress in SDN, and it has an impact on network security and performance.
Because of the flat design of SDN, where monitoring systems and defence solutions must be compliant to increase overall efficiency, energy savings, and network security, its integration is another security issue.
The risk of data plane layer security
Flood tables in the data plane are short on space, and storage flow entries in flow tables cause overhead, resulting in expensive costs and poor performance. This difficulty can be solved by employing clever flow table control techniques to hold a large number of low-cost, high-performance rules. Malicious users can disrupt network operations by launching a Denial of Service (DoS) assault on switches or access points, resulting in service interruption or network loss.
The risk of control plane layer security
Controllers are essential to SDN, but their centralised decision-making, which might initiate networking in the event of a security attack, makes them a single point of failure. Because of its transparent environment, the control layer is a desirable target for security threats. Another issue is the number of switches connected to the controller, and how many requests are submitted to the controller while waiting for a response. When you add a lot of switches to your controller's response time, the load on the controller can cause it to crash.
The risk of application plane layer security
To analyse a network node, the hacker can flood malicious data into the application layer, which can infect other linked network nodes. The attacker could get unauthorised access to the network node by introducing malicious code to analyse network packet flow and steal crucial data.
Did you find our blog 3 Top challenges of SDN helpful? Feel free to share on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook using the super-easy share buttons on the left below!